Showing posts with label Part 1. Exercise- 2 short poems. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Part 1. Exercise- 2 short poems. Show all posts

Wednesday, 27 February 2013

Collaboration. Third Photograph.


This poem also incorporates the following Exercise; Write 2 short poems with free metre and making different use of rhyme.


Here is Dave's third photo.



I was drawn to this one immediately. It evoked thoughts of of warmth, security, comfort and familiarity. Cosiness. This led me to think of the senses, the sounds and scents that might accompany such a place. The lighting suggested intimacy and nostalgia. I decided that this was a bedroom door and began thinking about whose room it was and about long term relationships in general. I was reminded, and probably influenced by the recent discussion on the Creative Writing student's forum about David Malouf's poem Stars.  I've copied the poem and my own part in the discussion here:

Stars.

The stars have so far to go
alone or in harness
across a window pane.

Hour after hour tonight
I’ve journeyed with them, steady
the waves of your breath.

Dark space between our beds;
on the table a full tumbler
splits the light of stars

to stars, or floats
a column of dead water,
dead sky. From centuries

off, out of the reign
of one of nineteen pharaohs
a planet’s dust, metallic,

alive, is sifted down,
hovers in a bright
arc upon your cheek.

Miraculous! I lean
across the dark and touch it,
you smile in your sleep.

How far, how far we’ve come
together, tumbling like stars
in harness or alone



The sparseness of this poem condenses the strong emotion, making it more powerful than a straightforward literal depiction might have done. I wonder if he is writing about a specific relationship here? The tenderness of the final stanza really conveys his emotion but I get a feeling of being compelled, like the stars, to a specific path. A taboo relationship perhaps? 
    To me he evokes a sense of aloneness in this poem which is a paradox to the idea of being 'harnessed'. But the use of 'harnessed' as opposed to an alternative adverb to describe being together is itself telling. To me 'harnessed ' implies lack of choice. As Jo says 'harnessed and alone' is such a resonant line. His repetition of the idea of distance, between the stars, between the beds, between the stars and the narrator, leads me to think of isolation despite the proximity of someone else. The stars are always within each other's orbit but never touch.
     I was completely flummoxed with the 'Nineteen pharoahs' and all I could find about the reference was the 'hardening of the heart' in Exodus. Relevant or not ? I have no idea.
     I agree with Miriam about his implication of hopelessness here and think it is effectively illustrated in the references to dark space and the way the sky and the stars become lifeless when reflected or captured in the glass.
     It seems that one of Malouf's formative sexual experiences occurred during an astronomy session (http://www.clivejames.com/books/meaning/malouf) and this could be reflected in the intensity with which he relates to the stars and his companion during this night of insomnia. One has to wonder why can't he sleep. He shows the insomnia very effectively with the passing time indicated by the stars having 'so far to go across a window pane' Very eloquently put and clearly conveyed. 
    There is no indication that his sleeping neighbour is anything other than a platonic friend but the combined result of the beautifully depicted imagery and the strong emotion speaks of yearning to me, which makes me think of unrequited love.

 It's clear that the idea of closeness and distance within relationships was on my mind, and along with the lovely lighting of Dave's subject and the evocation of familiarity, security, senses and sensuality I wrote the following poem.



Old Flames.

The flame stutters, dims in the night,
spilling vanilla scented smoke
that will linger, come the light
of the morning.

She draws the curtains, makes the bed
as she always does. Each day.
Smooths out the indent of his head
with hands that wear an aged woman’s skin.

Some solitary nights, across a great divide,
they seek a century of space,
so take their sides.
Touching, if at all, only their toes.

Some nights though,
still, they will be gilded, 
suffused by the softest amber glow,
of old flames and candle-light.




Saturday, 9 February 2013

Collaboration. Second photograph.


This poem also incorporates the following Exercise; Write 2 short poems with free metre and making different use of rhyme.


This is Dave's second photo. 



I'm enjoying the opportunity this project is giving me to look at how my own responses are formed. Dave offered no caption or explanation for this photo so I'm intrigued to hear his take on it after he's read my response to it. Initially when I studied the photo there seemed to be an ethereal quality to it, almost like a fairy tale. This aspect and the boat immediately led me to think of  Edward Lear's  'The Owl and the Pussycat';

The Owl and the Pussycat

The Owl and the Pussycat went to sea
In a beautiful pea-green boat,
They took some honey, and plenty of money,
Wrapped up in a five pound note.
The Owl looked up to the stars above,
And sang to a small guitar,
"O lovely Pussy! O Pussy, my love,
What a beautiful Pussy you are, you are, you are,
What a beautiful Pussy you are."

Pussy said to the Owl "You elegant fowl,
How charmingly sweet you sing.
O let us be married, too long we have tarried;
But what shall we do for a ring?"
They sailed away, for a year and a day,
To the land where the Bong-tree grows,
And there in a wood a Piggy-wig stood
With a ring at the end of his nose, his nose, his nose,
With a ring at the end of his nose.

"Dear Pig, are you willing to sell for one shilling your ring?"
Said the Piggy, "I will"
So they took it away, and were married next day
By the Turkey who lives on the hill.
They dined on mince, and slices of quince,
Which they ate with a runcible spoon.
And hand in hand, on the edge of the sand.
They danced by the light of the moon, the moon, the moon,
They danced by the light of the moon.

   As I read up a little about Edward Lear I learned that he 'is remembered primarily for his nonsense rhymes and limericks, but in his own lifetime he sought recognition as a landscape painter' (Harvard University Library 2003). Perusing the Harvard site (referenced and linked below) it is clear that he was extremely accomplished. Sir David Attenborough discusses his collection of Lear ornithological work here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-20081949 . Yet another 'creative' who worked across diciplines. It seems to be a common trait.
     But to get back to Dave's photo.  It seems that the iambic meter and rhyme scheme of Lear's poem inspired me to construct a loosely rhymed and metered poem myself. However the photo itself evoked contrasting feelings in me. On the one hand the composition and his post editing resulted in a beautiful fairy-tale atmosphere, while on the other the un-natural colours were disconcerting. Perhaps in an illustration they might have proved less so but in a photograph the colours led me to think of more ominous explanations. Perhaps I expect to see truth in photographs? Or try to equate them with reality more than I would with illustration or drawing? Whatever the deeper reasons for perspective the un-natural prettiness of the colours caused some disquiet.
    In addition to this there is currently much local debate about the building of huge nuclear waste dumps just a few miles away across the Solway in Cumbria. The two things combined to inspire my response to Dave's photo with the poem 'Geiger Counting'.


Geiger Counting.

Here is a boat without any oars
And a river of rippling ink.
Here acid water laps alkaline shores,
And poison is pretty
So pretty in pink.
You’ll find no safe harbour
No berth and no jetty,
This place is no Eden,
despite what you think.
They buried their waste in the
deep silent silos,
And poison looks pretty,
So pretty in pink.


So far I have no clear idea of what I want to do with this project but I'm erring towards the idea of revisiting the short responses at a later date and developing each poem into a finished piece of work. At the moment I see them as starting points. But Dave's photos are certainly catalysts that ignite many potential routes of inquiry. 

Dave's feedback pointed out that the use of 'they' and 'their in the lines 
'They buried their waste in the
deep silent silos'
suggested a remove and he wondered how I felt about changing it to 'we' and 'our'. Initially I agreed with him and changed it.


Geiger Counting.

Here is a boat without any oars
And a river of rippling ink.
Here acid water laps alkaline shores,
And poison is pretty
So pretty in pink.
You’ll find no safe harbour
No berth and no jetty,
This place is no Eden,
despite what you think.
We buried our waste in the
deep silent silos,
And poison looks pretty,
So pretty in pink.


 The change, although subtle, facilitated a more subjective sense to the poem, making the narrator complicit and remorseful. But on further reflection I felt that the objective, slightly detached tone of the impartial observer was lost along with the ironic observation that toxins can look attractive.I felt that the irony became somewhat cynical. So ultimately I think I prefer the original version but also decided to present both options here. It's interesting how such a slight alteration in the wording can totally change the perspective and the intended meaning of a poem.

References.

Harvard University Library. 2003. http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~hou01475 Accessed 09/02/2013.

Lear E. (1870) The Owl and the Pussycat  available at (http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/171941 accessed 9/102/13